If we could take the hate out of war, what would
war be? Would it then become an invasion, or
an imperialist venture, or maybe it would be a
bold and skilled military move,or a completely stupid military move. How can we justify the current White house strategy on the war, without bringing hatred into the picture. Let's
consider what the alternate rational behind this war would be if hatred was removed from the
equation. (war - hate = ?rational.)
RATIONAL: The U.S needed to control the oil reserves in the Middle East. Iraq had the second greatest oil reserves and Saddam Hussein's regime could be easily toppled. We needed Afghanistan for the Caspien Sea reserves , this was negotiated in 1998 with the Taliban but the Taliban backed out of the deal when the U.S threatened them with War if they did not comply. This was all done under the guise of Osama Bin Ladin and our need to attack Afghanistan as revenge for 911 , which the Bush boys created themselves. Bush's Boys
deceived the American people and the world trying to make us believe that Saddam Hussien had something to do with the terrorists, all while Bush bribed and intimidated the press not to investigate 911, and his own complicity.
This entire senario sounds like it was written by
a 5th rate novelist. Scooter Libby wrote another
horror spy novel called "Alpine" the book is an out of print paperback. Check out Amazon.com under Lewis Libby, Alpine.
Hope you enjoyed Koran Contemplation #2 and Comtempting the Koran can be located in my Archives as the first article of the
series. {L.A. STEEL }